Exxon CEO Warns Biden Administration Against Limiting Fuel Exports


Exxon Mobil Corp.

is pushing back against reductions of U.S. fuel exports urged by the Biden administration in August, arguing that restricting shipments would further squeeze global supplies and lift pump prices at home.

Exxon told the Energy Department this week that the oil industry shouldn’t slow fuel shipments in favor of putting more in storage tanks, according to a letter reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. Easing exports wouldn’t fill tanks in the Northeast—a region where U.S. officials said oil companies need to send more supplies—and instead would create a glut in the Gulf Coast that would lead refineries to cut output, according to the letter, which was signed by Exxon Chief Executive

Darren Woods.

At issue is whether U.S. fuel exports, which are near record levels, are hurting U.S. consumers, particularly in some regions like the East Coast where inventories are low. Administration officials have argued exports are contributing to declines in U.S. fuel stockpiles, while many energy executives disagree.

“Continuing current Gulf Coast exports is essential to efficiently rebalance markets—particularly with diverted Russian supplies,” Mr. Woods wrote. “Reducing global supply by limiting U.S. exports to build region-specific inventory will only aggravate the global supply shortfall.”

On Friday, after publication of the Journal’s story on Exxon’s letter, Energy Secretary

Jennifer Granholm

said U.S. energy companies need to take action to lower prices and refill low inventories of gasoline and diesel. She said energy companies are making record profits and passing on costs to consumers, alluding to Exxon’s record $17.9 billion second-quarter profit.

“These companies need to focus less on taking every last dollar off the table, and more on passing through savings to their customers,” Ms. Granholm said.

Oil companies have clashed this year with Democrats over supply shortages, record-high oil prices and soaring industry profits. After campaigning on a promise to reduce fossil fuel usage, Mr. Biden this year has asked oil companies to lift their fuel-making capacity, pump more oil out of the ground and expand exports of liquefied natural gas, or LNG, to ease a crisis in Europe.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine pushed oil prices to their highest levels in years and has made Europe and other nations increasingly reliant on U.S. fossil-fuel exports. In June, when U.S. gasoline prices hit a record $5 a gallon, U.S. exports of crude oil and finished products together hit 6.75 million barrels a day, the fourth-highest monthly figure on record and the biggest month since the onset of the pandemic in early 2020, U.S. data show. 

In August, Ms. Granholm sent a letter to oil companies urging them to reduce exports of fuel and instead refill stocks in the East Coast, a region at risk of fuel disruptions, in part, because of its distance from large Gulf Coast refineries. She said if the companies didn’t do so, the administration would consider “additional federal requirements or emergency measures,” which many analysts interpreted as a threat to limit exports.

“The most effective way to resolve this issue without having to deploy emergency actions is for industry to prioritize building inventories during this critical window,” she wrote in her letter. “The data clearly show there has not been sufficient progress in building inventories ahead of peak hurricane season.”

Increased overseas shipments contributed to an increase in the price of gasoline and diesel earlier this summer, oil analysts said at the time.



Ms. Granholm has also discussed export restrictions with industry executives in private conversations, according to people familiar with the matter. At a press conference in September, she said the administration wasn’t currently weighing any restrictions. 

Following a meeting Friday between Ms. Granholm, White House officials and oil executives, the oil-industry trade groups American Petroleum Institute and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers said the administration “refuses to rule out limitations on exports.”

“We shared the significant unintended consequences that would come with such a policy, including potential cost increases, refinery closures, job losses and productivity declines,” the groups said.

Earlier this year, domestic inventories of crude and products languished at their lowest levels since 2015. American refiners have lost almost 5% of their daily fuel-making capacity since the pandemic began through facility shutdowns and conversions to biofuels, while shale drillers kept oil output roughly flat from December to June, according to federal data.  

The boost in overseas shipments helped to drain fuel inventories further, and factored into the rapid price increases in gasoline and diesel earlier this year, oil analysts said at the time. Likewise, rising LNG exports have pushed domestic natural-gas prices higher this year, as well.

Some of the political pressure from high energy prices has abated, for now. Gasoline prices have dropped more than $1.20 a gallon since reaching the peak of about $5 a gallon in June, as oil prices have come down on fears of an economic downturn. Inventories of gasoline across the U.S. have increased almost 6% since early June. 

In his letter, Mr. Woods said the East Coast had 59.3 million barrels of total gasoline and ethanol in storage, about 1% lower than usual for that time of year. Demand for gasoline through June, he said, was 9% below the average in the three years before the Covid-19 pandemic. 


Should the U.S. stop fuel exports? Why or why not? Join the conversation below.

Mr. Woods also said pipelines that carry fuel from the Gulf Coast to the East Coast are full. Without waivers of the Jones Act—the law passed a century ago that effectively limits the number of vessels allowed to move goods between U.S. ports—Mr. Woods said there aren’t enough ships to move more U.S.-made fuel to the Northeast. 

On Wednesday, the Biden administration issued a temporary Jones Act waiver, allowing a tanker carrying diesel to unload its 300,000-barrel cargo into Puerto Rico.

Exxon primarily sells gasoline to the East Coast market, according to Mr. Woods’s letter. If a supply disruption occurred in the Northeast, the company could move fuel from elsewhere in the Midwest and from refineries in other countries, he said. 

“Free market incentives remain the most efficient way for the industry to address these problems,” Mr. Woods said. 

Write to Collin Eaton at collin.eaton@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Source link